Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
William Grant vs Fermin Tenti Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Grant vs Tenti analysis and find out who is favored!
William Grant vs Fermin Tenti Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Grant 1 - 0 Tenti
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Grant has won 49.13% of points on their second serve, while Tenti has won 45.78%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Grant, in recent form, has won 51.97% of their opponent's second serve points, while Tenti has won 57.01%. The same stats for first serve returns are 36.88% and 39.94% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Grant has saved 55.49% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Tenti has saved 57.07% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Grant has won 62.9% of matches played (W/L 39/ 23), with Tenti winning 53.23% (W/L 33/ 29) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Grant has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 65% (W/L 11/ 6), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 39/ 35). Tenti has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 53% (W/L 215/ 191), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 45% (W/L 26/ 32).
- Player level: In the last year, Grant has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 62.71% of matches (W/L 37/ 22), where as Tenti has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 55.17% of matches (W/L 32/ 26). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Grant winning 1 times and Tenti being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Grant winning 2 and Tenti winning 0. The last match between Grant and Tenti was at the M15 Lodz, 28-07-2022, Second, Clay with William Grant getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:49:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Grant and Tenti have played a deciding set 0 times, with Grant winning 0 times and Tenti 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Grant winning 0, and Tenti 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Grant has played against opponents with an average rank of 152.4 while Tenti has played against players with an average rank of 172.82.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Grant has won 71% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Tenti has won 48% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Grant has converted 46.73% of breakpoint opportunities, and Tenti has converted 49.73% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
704
Rank
704
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
869
Rank
561
High
26
Age
R
Plays
W
L
W
L
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
W
W
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
55% (73-59)
Career Total W/L
52% (241-223)
65% (22-12)
YTD W/L
59% (17-12)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | William Grant | Fermin Tenti |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 8 |
| Aces (Total) | 8 | 1 |
| DFs (Total) | 8 | 5 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:49:0 | 1:49:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 51% (32/63) | 62% (48/77) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 69% (22/32) | 67% (32/48) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 48% (15/31) | 31% (9/29) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 27% (4/15) | 40% (2/5) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (36/77) | 41% (26/63) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 6-4 |
Stats 
William Grant
Player
Fermin Tenti
51%
(
32 of
63)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
8
Aces
1
8
Double Faults
5
69%
(
22 of
32)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
41%
(
26 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
36 of
77)
73
Total Points Won
67
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | William Grant | Fermin Tenti |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 65% (22/12) | 59% (17/12) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (46/32) | 58% (39/28) |
| Games Win/Loss | 54% (388/325) | 54% (342/288) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (10/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 63% (10/6) | 59% (17/12) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.34 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 119 | 22 |
| DFs per game | 0.24 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 83 | 35 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:30:52 | 1:36:28 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 180.68 | 112.1 |
| 1st Serve % | 59% (1158/1962) | 69% (1046/1520) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (772/1158) | 61% (636/1046) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 49% (395/804) | 46% (217/474) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (100/214) | 50% (92/185) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (837/1979) | 46% (698/1510) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 65% (20/11) | 59% (17/12) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 65% (22/34) | 61% (17/28) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 43% (3/7) | 57% (4/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (8/10) | 50% (5/10) |
| 1st set W, W | 95% (19/18) | 94% (16/15) |
| 1st set W, L | 5% (19/1) | 6% (16/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 27% (15/4) | 15% (13/2) |
William Grant Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Dan Martin
Player
William Grant
68%
(
46 of
68)
1st Serve %
43%
(
24 of
56)
5
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
5
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
41%
(
9 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
34%
(
23 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
28 of
56)
73
Total Points Won
51
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Corey Craig
49%
(
29 of
59)
1st Serve %
70%
(
35 of
50)
4
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
60%
(
18 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
23 of
50)
61
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
55%
(
24 of
44)
1st Serve %
60%
(
26 of
43)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
21 of
43)
55
Total Points Won
32
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Nicaise Muamba
60%
(
33 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
37 of
63)
6
Aces
8
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
28 of
37)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
25 of
63)
64
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Andres Andrade
Player
William Grant
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
63%
(
30 of
48)
3
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
61%
(
11 of
18)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
56
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Benjamin Thomas George
52%
(
50 of
97)
1st Serve %
71%
(
77 of
108)
10
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
6
72%
(
36 of
50)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
48 of
77)
47%
(
22 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
43 of
108)
101
Total Points Won
104
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Cooper Woestendick
Player
William Grant
52%
(
45 of
87)
1st Serve %
60%
(
49 of
82)
2
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
6
58%
(
26 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
57%
(
24 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
38 of
82)
88
Total Points Won
81
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Maxwell Benson
51%
(
46 of
90)
1st Serve %
66%
(
51 of
77)
5
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
2
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
32 of
51)
50%
(
22 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
32 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
77
|
4-6 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Garrett Johns
Player
William Grant
57%
(
45 of
79)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
7
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
2
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
22 of
45)
35%
(
12 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
100%
(
7 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
46%
(
36 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
41 of
75)
84
Total Points Won
70
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
William Grant
Player
Chad Kissell
58%
(
72 of
124)
1st Serve %
49%
(
40 of
82)
3
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
5
64%
(
46 of
72)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
30 of
40)
44%
(
23 of
52)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
17 of
42)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
35 of
82)
104
Total Points Won
102
|
5-7 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Fermin Tenti Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Svyatoslav Gulin
Player
Fermin Tenti
100%
(
16 of
16)
1st Serve %
41%
(
9 of
22)
3
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
75%
(
12 of
16)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
0%
(
0 of
0)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
11 of
22)
23
Total Points Won
15
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Simon Anthony Ivanov
75%
(
44 of
59)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
1
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
19 of
25)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
17 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Daniel Bagnolini
77%
(
48 of
62)
1st Serve %
53%
(
30 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
34 of
48)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
31%
(
19 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
29 of
57)
72
Total Points Won
47
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Diego Barreto Sanchez
Player
Fermin Tenti
60%
(
39 of
65)
1st Serve %
78%
(
38 of
49)
1
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
2
62%
(
24 of
39)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
43%
(
28 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
28 of
49)
65
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Kristijan Juhas
90%
(
38 of
42)
1st Serve %
83%
(
35 of
42)
1
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
49%
(
17 of
35)
50%
(
2 of
4)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
11 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
23 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Sean Hess
72%
(
67 of
93)
1st Serve %
73%
(
64 of
88)
0
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
64%
(
43 of
67)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
32 of
64)
38%
(
10 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
69%
(
9 of
13)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
43%
(
40 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
49 of
88)
102
Total Points Won
79
|
6-2 6-7(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gorazd Srbljak
Player
Fermin Tenti
58%
(
40 of
69)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
53%
(
21 of
40)
1st Serve Won
46%
(
18 of
39)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
47%
(
8 of
17)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
51%
(
35 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
36 of
58)
70
Total Points Won
57
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Facundo Mena
Player
Fermin Tenti
51%
(
24 of
47)
1st Serve %
79%
(
33 of
42)
6
Aces
0
-
Double Faults
-
75%
(
18 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
34%
(
16 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
22 of
42)
53
Total Points Won
36
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Daniel Antonio Nunez
71%
(
102 of
144)
1st Serve %
56%
(
90 of
161)
0
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
61%
(
62 of
102)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
57 of
90)
55%
(
23 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
32 of
71)
31%
(
5 of
16)
Break Points Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
41%
(
59 of
144)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
72 of
161)
157
Total Points Won
148
|
6-7(3) 7-5 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Fermin Tenti
Player
Franco Ribero
77%
(
51 of
66)
1st Serve %
72%
(
41 of
57)
1
Aces
2
-
Double Faults
-
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
18 of
41)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
4 of
16)
88%
(
7 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
5 of
5)
47%
(
31 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
35 of
57)
70
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Grant Vs Tenti Prediction H2H Images To Share
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Fermin Tenti
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
